Pages

Showing posts with label Investing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Investing. Show all posts

Sunday, 28 October 2018

Cash is not King. Cashflow is.

When it comes to the topic of investing, I believe everyone out here wanted the same outcome - which is to allow our money to grow. In another words, by investing, we want our money to come out more than what we place into.

But sadly, the perfect world is never constructed in such a fashion and it is not always the case as there is many that actually came out with lesser money than injected.
 
Being a not-very-smart investor myself, I believe that aside the homework or due-diligence that is done, we need a fair share of luck to help us out as well.






By receiving dividends from my stock holding, it does provide me with a decent level of comfort, and at the same time, it does help me a little by reducing on my transaction fees as there is lesser buying and selling.

When a company pays us dividend, this actually creates an additional source of income for ourselves, which increases our cash flow. 

Similarly to a business, cash flow is a very important aspect in our financial state.




When we spend more than what we earn, our cash flow is negative. To finance the expenditure, we will have to tap on our retained earnings (savings) or take up loan to do so. However, if a negative cash flow is a norm, our savings will deplete or we will end up with a snowball of debt.



If we do not know how to manage our finances, regardless of how high our salary is, we will still end every month with a sad note, while we anxiously wait for our salary to be in.








If you're taking home $3,000 a month and spending $2,500 each month. We're still positive with $500 here. This will also translate to a spending rate of 83%

However, if you're spending $4,000. This is when you have a negative cash flow of $1,000!




Assuming, the salary now increases to $5,000. Taking the same rate of spending, we're actually looking at positive cash flow of $1,500!

The equation today is pretty clear cut.

To increase our cash flow, we can either:
1. Increase our income/Create additional stream of income
2. Decrease our expenses

Optimally, both 1 and 2 has to be done together to yield the best result. 

So why is cash flow exactly the King and not cash?

I'll draw a simple example to illustrate this.

Person A, retired with $200,000 in cash. Spending $1,000 every mth, with inflation at 3%. This person will not be able to make through the 14th year. Person A has a negative cash flow every month and has been using his savings to make it through.






Person B, retired with $200,000 in assets generating 5% dividends per year, inflation at 3%. This person will not be able to make through the 26th year. And yes, person B is having a negative cash flow as well! But with a source of income, the impact he'll face to die from hunger is delayed by 12 years!




Realize the differences?

So what if one has an inflow greater than outflow

Your guess is as good as mine. With a greater inflow than outflow, this person will be able to even accumulate more wealth as he is spending money! 

If this person continues to re-invest his excess cash into this retirement pot, he would probably be able to survive till the day Hades decided to look for him!




But again, at certain point of times, being filled with cash represents opportunity. But if the cash here is not being used meaningfully, it defeats the purpose and the cash here is just a stagnant pile of papers. 

By having a certain level of cash with us, this will provide us with some form of hedging. But if we are overly-hedged we have indirectly incurred more losses to our monies than we could do to "protect" it!

To make it clear, it is important for one to have cash to protect themselves. When they're lucky with cash, they will be presented more opportunities. 

However, if we do not make good use of it, it is still useless.

Whereas, it is essential for us to have a strong free cash flow.


You will also be able to look for me on some other platforms:
1. FB Page - The sleepydevil
2. InvestingNote - sleepydevil
3. SGX Cafe - sleepydevil
4. You may also subscribe to receive my latest email updates here
 

Thursday, 12 July 2018

Controllable VS Uncontrollable Factors

There's many things in this planet.

Some are controllable and we will be able to control them within our means, while the others are uncontrollable.

I will be able to control the speed of my vehicle by stepping on the accelerator or the brakes.
I will be able to control my emotions to prevent myself from over reacting.
I will be able to control my decisions and body to do something.

BUT..



I'm unable to control the speed of another car and the chances of getting into an accident if the driver is reckless. But, I'll be able to stay vigilant and alert to the road conditions to prevent the odds of getting into one.

I'm unable to control another person's reaction when this person is filled with emotions. But what I can do is to console this person and possibly change the emotions they have in them, which might prevent the person from doing something silly.

I'm unable to control other's decision and body if they're going to do something. But, similarly, I'm able to provide help by all means to change the fact.

It can applies to Mr Market too!

Importantly, we have to first understand ourselves and define the controllable and uncontrollable in each situation.

I might be speaking a little too early today especially when it come to Mr Market's term as I'm relatively new.

But defining the controllable, I'll see things such as emotion, decision, portfolio sizing, risk appetite etc.



How about the uncontrollable? Market movement, the rationality of Mr Market, Volatility, price movements, upcoming company's performance etc.

Prior to making any decisions, it's important for us to do some homework to get a clearer picture, else it makes no differences from gambling or speculation.

I could use several tools along to help me with that. Upon seeing a clearer picture, I will then need to control my emotions and not act irrationaly.

As humans, if we are always thinking about the uncontrollable factors affecting us. We will soon be affected by things that are controllable. 

If I'm constantly affected by the price of a particular counter and losing sleep over it, it's likely that I'm overly-invested.



And having that said, things such as my emotions and decision will make it's way to the door. 

This is when we're going to be affected by things that are controllable.

It's important to make plans and be prepared for contigency! It's about the probability and not certainty. 

How good would it be if we've a controller all to ourself? 


Saturday, 5 May 2018

22 Years Old, Stepping Into The Field Of Investing

Reader:
Hey there,

I'm XX, ladyyoucanbefree introduced me to you when we have a quick chat. I have look across your blog and it was very impressive and eye opening for a guy at your age to have such planning on future.

I'm 22 this year, and would like to step into the field of investing. I'm currently working full time and studying part time now, and as what you quoted, I'm definitely not interested to be sticking at my office for more than half of my life. I'm very new to this game, and if you don't mind, can you guide me through how to start off in this journey? 

Side note, just curious, how much are you putting in for invest per month?

Thanks and hope to hear from you soon!




Me:
Hi XX,
First and foremost, a warm welcome to my blog. I'm really glad to know another young adult that is interested in taking the path towards financial freedom. A big thumbs up to you for the courage to venture into the field of investing. 


Ladyyoucanbefree is a very wise and experienced senior in our local financial blogosphere. Personally, I enjoy her post really much and have learned much from her. 

I've to first say that I'm in no position to provide any financial advice and I'm still learning along the way too :)  

Nonetheless, I'm more than glad to share my journey and thoughts with you.

To start off, let me answer your question on 'how much are you putting in for invest per month' - I do not have a fixed amount that I invest every month. As I'm previously studying full time and engaged in different part-time jobs, my income fluctuates pretty much around. I follow more closely to a fixed % rather than fixed amount. This % is a variable and you may tune it to your own comfort :)
Do note that this war chest is used strictly for investment only. In another word, funds for investment. The funds here will be used to purchase different investment vehicle such as stocks, bonds etc. 

The war chest is only used when I see opportunity in investment. Else, that funds will be inside, waiting for Mr Market to turn moody. When my income is lower, my war chest will have a lower amount and the opposite when my income is higher. 

In that sense, I understand that higher earnings in important, and that I will be able to live comfortably when my income is not that high for a particular month. 



1. Emergency Funds & Understanding your risk appetite:
For your case, I believe having a full-time job, your income is pretty much stable and fixed and it will be much easier for you to follow a fixed % if you should. Discipline is important for us and we must remember to set aside an adequate amount of emergency funds (based on your 6-12 month's monthly expenses).  This emergency funds will have to come in first before any investment so that in any case that an emergency comes, such as job-loss (loss of income) etc. you will not be suffocating from paying your day-to-day expenses. Having that said, your war-chest will not be utilized in an emergency for non-investment related activities. When your funds in war chest are used for non-invested related activities, this defeats the purpose of having one.
Some might be fine without emergency funds, some prefer more, some prefer less. 

This ultimately voices down to your risk appetite and level of comfort.

 
It is very important to first know yourself to determine this and certainly to choosing your investment gameplay/vehicle.

You may wish to refer to this post of mine for some a little more clues about my various accounts: 
How many accounts does 19-year-old student have?





2. Decide your investment vehicle (eg. Stocks, Bonds, FOREX, Precious Metals, Commodities, Cryptocurrency etc.) and Gameplay:
Next up, it's also important to differentiate and choose your gameplay in the market. Eg. Investor or Trader as both of their game works differently. An investor buys shares and keeps them for a really long-term whereas a trader trades for profit.

After choosing your gameplay, this is when you will need to identify the tool you will be using to "amplify" your wealth. It does not make perfect sense for me to invest in precious metal for dividend as they are non-income generating assets. 'Investors' of such asset classes typically buy into such asset in an attempt/believe for its value to appreciate. This is when they sell it to realize the capital gain/profit.

In that aspect, it may probably sound better to trade them as traders "earn" by the difference in price between buying and selling.

If you're into investing, there are another 4 routes for you to choose - Growth investors, Income investors, Passive Investors or certainly Speculative Investors and the common vehicle used here is the equities market (shares).

Growth investors or even value investors buy into things where that they see a growth/value in. Do not be confused by them although both growth and value investors sound pretty similar. In that aspect, they are looking into the fundamental of the company they are buying into and would tend to hold for a really long time.

G
rowth stocks receive returns from future capital appreciation (the difference between the amount paid for a stock and its current value), rather than dividends while Value stocks are those that tend to trade at a lower price relative to their fundamentals (including dividends, earnings, and sales).
For a simple analogy, it's just like buying a condominium at 800k when it's worth 1m.
For this condominium, there are future developments like MRT that are currently under construction and in an area near town. Hence, when the developments are completed, the value of this condominium is likely to fetch a higher price. The owner can then chooses to sell the property or certainly rent it for a higher price.




Income investors invest primarily in equities for the regular dividend. Eg. REITs or Business Trust. Likewise, we have to also understand the fundamental well for the REIT we are buying into and not a value trap. For a simple analogy, it's just like buying a house and renting the house out for rental income.

Speculative investors are more commonly seen around where they will buy into a particular investment vehicle with no homework is done or purely based on what they hear.
For example - John and Brock are good friends. Brock recommended Creative to John when Creative is trading at $10 after surging from $1 in 2 weeks. John, after hearing this piece of news, eagerly cashed in $10,000 and went in to buy stocks from Creative at $10. He then speculates that Creative will continue to surge past the $20 mark. However, the price is seen tumbling to $5.86 today. The question now is - Is Brock to be blamed? 

There's also another type of investors - the Passive Investor which invest in ETFs and maybe even robo advisor. Some common methods that they employ are the DCA (Dollar Cost Averaging) and Buy-and-Hold approach. Passive investors aim to maximize returns over the long run by keeping the amount of buying and selling to a minimum. The idea is to avoid the fees and the drag on performance that potentially occur from frequent trading. Passive investing is not aimed at making quick gains or at getting rich with one great bet, but rather on building slow, steady wealth over time.
This long-run could easily stretch over decades and several market cycle.


Read more: Passive Investing - Investopedia 

Related post:
Is Investment Really So Difficult?
Transaction cost - Are You a Trader or Investor






3. Setting up the required accounts for your gameplay:
I'd first have to admit that I'm more of an equities investor than a trader. Hence, I believe that my knowledge in the other field is inadequate.
  

Let's say you've decided to go along with investor and have chosen equities (stocks) to be the vehicle you would like to use, the next step for one to be engaged in Singapore equities will be to have a brokerage and CDP account.
The brokers will act as an agent for which you buy and sell your securities from and CDP account will act as an account for which your shares and bonds are deposited into/withdrawn from. There are many brokers available around and personally, I do own 2 different brokerage account - POEMS PCMA and DBS Vickers Cash Upfront. I have been using more of the latter recently due to the attractive commission they're charging for the moment.  

CDP account can be easily created when you register with your brokers and this is a one-time thing. When you decide to change your brokers, simply link your CDP account to your new brokerage account.  

Now, this is easy and it will only involve some waiting time and probably a visit to the broker.

For passive investing, one could use certain tools like OCBC BCIP, POSB Invest-Saver, POEMS share builder or Maybank MIP to purchase some shares or ETFs.


4. Preparing for the fight
Now next step is to do some homework. This can come by performing Fundamental Analysis (FA) to look into the fundamentals of the company you're buying into. FA will equip you with the necessary knowledge on how the company is currently priced at, their earnings, financial situation, cash flow etc. For this, you will look into the balance sheet, income statement, cash flow statement, financial report and annual report for more clue. 

Another approach most commonly used by traders is Technical Analysis (TA). This is a tool which will tell us the probability of the price movement in the shorter term. We will also be able to identify if the counter is overbought, oversold, resistance level, support level, divergence etc. This can be used along together with FA for a possibly 'better' entry price.  

I will point you to some of my different post I've written previously and you may wish to take a look for some clue. 


Unfortunately, with my tiny capital and insufficient knowledge, I'm not a successful investor like what many would see around and I still have much to learn along the way. 

There are many bloggers around which have really insightful and comprehensive analysis around. Similarly, do take note that this is not a buying/selling call and take them with a pinch of salt!   




There's many senior, wise and very experienced blogger around the local blogosphere which I would recommend for different insights and learnings as well.
5. STE's Stock Investing Journey

You may also wish to drop by TheFinance.sg
TFS is basically a blog aggregator for the local financial blogs and you will be able to find many other bloggers around :)


Having that said, I hope that I've answered your queries and that you find the information above useful for you.

Do feel free to get back to me anytime, I'm more than glad to be of your service and will reply at my very first availability.



Regards,
sleepydevil



Sunday, 22 April 2018

Young adult thinking to start on investment.. with Rolex?

Recently, over dinner, I've been brought to attention when one of my colleague express interest towards investing.

Hence, being a curious listener and a little excited, I couldn't hold myself to ask more.
This is one of my first time seeing a young person in real who's interested in this topic and having goals.

Surprisingly, another fan of Robert Kiyosaki!

Rich Dad, Poor Dad - Robert Kiyosaki
We were chatting about some daily stuff before hearing this.. a house is a liability and we need to escape the rat race. This instantly rings a bell right in my head - Rich dad, poor dad.....

"I'm interested to get some investment before my savings is eroded by inflation and is looking to buy assets"

As a curious audience.. I asked: What type of asset are you looking to get? Property?

"Nah. Property is a waste of money. It's a liability"





Another fan of Robert Kiyosaki I thought.

"...I'm looking into getting a Rolex in 2 years time. I believe that they're a really good investment and milestone. I've read from a book that we must buy asset and not liability!"
I'm stunned for a moment




Upon hearing so.. I decided that I should remain silent and continue eating my noodles.

I believe that this fella here would have read the book - Rich Dad, Poor Dad, and have understood that there is 2 column in your balance sheet - Asset & Liability.

According to the book, an asset is something that puts money into your pocket while a liability is something that takes money of out it. 

And to get rich, one simply get more 'asset'!

Applying the actual definition to an asset, indeed, Rolex is a tangible asset and it does hold it's price well over the years.  One must not forget that Rolex is a luxury consumer goods and to keep it well running, you're requireed to send it in for servicing.

Aside that, you've to keep this 'asset' of yours in a good condition in order for you to cash out your 'profit' in the future! This servicing here will cost you money and it does not put money into your pocket.

Arguably, yes. The servicing you're looking at is your 'cost', and by selling it in the future, provided at a big gain, you will not be seeing anything out of this asset apart from the ticking hands. Any knock and dings while you're wearing it, will in fact take cents out from your pocket.

Throwing all this aside. Any seniors who bought a Rolex many many years ago at $1000 or 2000. May see that the same model now cost $10,000.

We must not forget that $1000 or 2000 back then is relatively 'big' too!
Hence, your purchasing power did not change!

Similarly to some who includes the value of your HDB in the list of your 'assets'!
For the duration that you're staying in it, this HDB does not put money into your pocket!
Probably.. unless you rent a room out.
 
Not forgetting our HDBs in Singapore has only 99 years of lease!

How now!?

To my friend above, it is pretty much a milestone in some sense that you've gotten your 'first luxury watch', 'I've earned my first 5 digits in my life' or probably a terrible way to say it is 'I've spent the first 5 digits I've earned in my life'.

Perspective is important.

As a human, I do love Rolex watches and would gladly get one in the future, as a luxury good to pamper myself.

Not an 'asset' in which I have to hope and pray for the value of it to go up in order for my gains to be 'realized'.

Another thing to remember about 'realizing your gains' is that, when you sells it in the future, this is marked as a pre-owned product, and the market here is different.

There's definietly some rare or limited Rolexes that will probably be a really good investment in due time.

As time is a very important factor in investing, there is no certainty in investment.
I know there's many who believes that Rolex is an investment.

I'm not an watch expert here.
But a Rolex to me. Is merely a watch.
As a person who love watches, I do have my weak spots too.
But, for now. A Rolex is definietly not for me :)

Nonetheless, if I happen to have one, I'm clear on what I expect from my Rolex.

Monday, 19 February 2018

Why DCA Investing Singtel Can Be Good for Your Portfolio

Before entering this post, please pardon me and correct me for any mistakes that is written in this post. Two wise seniors have recently written on DCA for Singtel and I would like to take this chance to write about my thoughts on the DCA for Singtel. Both the post shared by them are very interesting post which triggered some thoughts of mine and I feel that their both their blogs (B and Uncle CW8888) has educated me well throughout my learning.

I would like this opportunity to thank them first before touching more on my post.

Both their blogs can also be found on my blog list located at the right panel on my blog and I've been a fond reader of their blogs for a long time.

Next up, Happy Chinese New Year to everyone that is reading this right now. Wishing everyone a blissful and healthy new year ahead and may everyone huat big big in their financial journey ahead :)

Read:
Why DCA Investing Singtel Can Be Bad For Your Portfolio - B, Forever Financial Freedom
DCA or Simple Average Down -  Uncle CW8888

So what exactly is DCA (Dollar Cost Average)?
A simple check on Google will bring you to the model definition here by Investopedia. Hence, please take a look at the image below:
From Google - Investopedia's definition
Having that said, DCA is a passive way of investing and it is different from averaging down.

Now, there is many different ways that you can actually perform DCA that is available in the market such as POSB Invest-Saver (on Nikko AM STI ETF etc.), OCBC BCIP, Maybank MIP etc.



Such accounts provided by the different institutions offers a relatively low fee for you to perform DCA and not hurt your pocket badly due to the expensive brokerage fees when dealing with small lots. There is also limited selections available for such plans with exception to OCBC BCIP (where you can touch more on the blue chips) and Maybank MIP (which offers a wide range of counters for you to choose from). 

A downside of such plans which I do not particularly enjoy is that, the shares purchased will be held under their custody and not deposited into your CDP account.

However, today's topic - DCA on Singtel. If one is to seriously do so and does not mind the shares being under their custody, you may wish to consider OCBC BCIP which charges $5 and Maybank MIP which charges SGD 1/1% for amount below S$1,000.


Now let's back to the topic. 
In the case study conducted by B on DCA on Singtel which is done on:
1. A 10-year period from the peak of 4.22 on Oct-07 till today
2. DCA done when dividends is given by Singtel (Jan and Aug)

In the post shared by B, there was several people that had dropped by and commented that the DCA should be done on a fixed amount rather than fixed units, which is true to reflect the actual concept behind DCA. 

Another thing I felt is the interval/frequency of performing the 'DCA'.



As the frequency (Jan & Aug), twice a year is relatively small. I feel that the DCA concept is not well made use of. To improve on the model slightly, I have done a tweak and had increased the frequency DCA is performed on Singtel.

On a side note, I've believe that the prices during the CD/XD period or weeks due to release of it's financial report are slightly irrelevant as the volume during such periods are relatively higher due to the increased speculators that are on board or shorting it in anticipation of it's result, which does not reflect it's prices well, hence explaining the increased frequency.

Thus, with the increased frequency, I believe that the DCA concept can be better make used of.

In the table below, I've controlled certain parameters for this exercise which is listed as such:
1. Amount of S$500 in each purchase.
2. An interval of 2 months between each purchase (ie. 6 purchase/year) 
3. Purchase conducted on first of every month (Aside first purchase of 4.22)
4. Dividends reinvested

Unchanged factor is:
1. Buying at the peak of 4.22 (10 October 2007)
2. Starting and Ending Duration (Oct-07 to Feb-18)
3. Price as of 17 Feb at 3.33

Note: Dividends for Jan will be added to Feb's amount for dividend reinvestment

The list ahead is very long, hence, please pardon me once again:
Page 1
Page 2


Page 3
As shown in the 3 images above, here's some conclusion:
I will round the total units to the nearest purchasable lot on SGX (Singtel10, Z77):




From the above set of data, we will derive with a P/L of $10,424.70
This translates to a P/L of 33.09%
However, this will only happen if your dividends are reinvested. 

If you notice, the P/L (dividends) I've labelled is negative. This is because the amount of dividends received at $11,406.13 is more than the the P/L of actual value $10,424.70. Which in another words, the recent price movement has caused the returns to be lesser than the original dividends received. 

However, you're still sitting on a profit of 33.09% based on your capital of $31,500

Two flaws represented by this set of data are the odd number of lots during each purchase and transaction fees that is excluded and definitely the chances of having your orders fulfilled.

Allow me to rectify these flaws one by one:
Adjusting the units purchased each time to the nearest 10 unit which can be purchased from the market (Singtel10,  Z77). We will have $883.86 lesser in capital injection. This will result in lesser dividends receive, lesser total units and higher average price. This will impact directly onto our returns for this activity. The updated tab now tells me that we will have an average price of $2.58 compared to the earlier. I will not be sharing the lengthy 70 odds column of data in the second example to avoid further confusion.


Nonetheless, you're still sitting on a P/L of 29.19% based on your entry price.
Next part, transaction fees:
Example 1:
Now let me play with the transaction fee (assuming that all these trade are executed by using the big brokers available around. 
The average transaction amount across the 10 years comes up to roughly $681.05
Taking that amount into consideration for the transaction fee imposed by the brokers around $25 + 0.0075% (SGX Access Fee) + 7% (GST) + Clearing Fee, we will derive with a sum of $27.04 for each trade. 

Total Transaction Fees = $27.04 x 63 sessions = $1,703.52


Now, this is massive transaction fees and it eats into the profit by nearly 20%! 

Nonetheless, having that said, We're still positive!!
Our new P/L with transaction fees in will come up to = $10,424.70 - 1,703.52 = $8,717.18
This will translate to a P/L of 27.67%
This work out to an annalized return of 2.9%

I do agree with B that this is nothing to shout about compared to our CPF OA account at 2.5% and not forgetting our SA. The key difference here is the liquidity and availability of the funds.  

Total Duration = 3785 Days (10 Oct 07 - 19 Feb 18)

Example 2: 
Average Transaction amount across 10 years: $662.12
Average Transaction Fees: $27.04
Total Transaction Fees: $27.04 x 63 = $1,703.52
P/L = 9193.48 - 1703.52 = $7489.96
P/L (%) = 23.77%
This work out to an annualized return of 2.15%, which is lesser than what our CPF account is able to provide us. 

Finally, in this exercise, I would now conclude that:
1. Compounding interest is really the 8th wonder of the world.
2. Panadols are indeed effective in this exercise
3. DCA is not a scam but a passive way of investing
4. Transaction fees does matters in this higher frequency and small amount orders
5. There is no foolproof method in buying stocks and that passive investing might not be better than active investing. Fortunately, for this exercise with Singtel, you does not lose out much.

Though this exercise, we see positive returns on both hands which might mean that this approach of DCA on Singtel might be good on your portfolio, I do have some thoughts which I've left out in the lengthy post on top.

With the increased frequency in this exercise, we also managed to obtain 2 positive results as compared to the negative return on B's case study. Adding on, with the dividends reinvested, we do see another different horizon to amount of shares we hold as well as the P/L.

I'm sure that we will be able to find better companies for this activity which I agree with B and Singtel is not bullet-proof despite Singtel being my greatest holding. We must remember that our average price, entry price and exit price matters in each investment.

With this 12,000 odd units from this tweaked DCA in this past 10 years and dividends reinvested, we will be able to receive roughly $175/month of passive income assuming Singtel's dividend of 17.5 cents is maintained and based on the average price of $2.50, we are looking at a yield of 7%.

Indeed, the numbers is really attractive.

However, if you have purchased this 12,500 when it's $2.50 in Feb-09, the dividends you've received in this 10 year be added to the bulk of sum you see here, which you can look at it in 2 different glasses - you Singtel shares cost you $0.74 each ($1.76 dividends) and in 5 years time (assuming dividends maintained), these 12,500 shares of Singtel would be free of cost :)

See the difference now? :)


Saturday, 10 February 2018

How will your portfolio look like during the next financial crisis?

With the recent sell down that is happening around the global markets, many financial bloggers around have posted about their thoughts.

I thought it would be a great chance for me to do so as well, after all, this is the first time that I'm experiencing the sea of reds!

Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) have experienced a 10.36% drop from it's high at 26,616.71 since January 26, which technically is 14 days ago. This also means that for every $100 you put into DJIA on January 26, you'll be left with $90 today.



If we were to take a look at the bigger picture, this is the first correction since 2016 that DJIA is experiencing after a 49.37% bull run (even till closing today), and 66.63% bull run to it's ATH on January 26 2018.

Now, it's pretty obvious that we are in Mr Bear's territory today.
According to what Investopedia has jotted down, this is the definition for 'Bear Market'

from Investopedia
"Downturn of 20% or more from a peak in multiple broad market indexes, such as the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) or Standard & Poor's 500 Index (S&P 500), over a two-month period is considered an entry into a bear market"

After DJIA closes earlier today, we're steps away from entering the '20% downturn'
Just a moment.. our local STI does not sway too far from DJIA too!

From it's high of 3,609.24 a month after X'mas eve till today, STI has also shredded close to 7% from it's high over 2 weeks! 

Here's a difference between DJIA and STI. 
DJIA has scaled up to it's historical high.
While STI on the other hand have barely touch it's high since pre-GFC.

So is there really still room for the recovery?
Does this look like a technical correction? 
Or the crash is coming? 

While most commonly, there is usually a catalyst to trigger a crash from such sell-downs to put investors into panic mode, for this very moment now, there is not such a catalyst like the collapse of Lehman Brother (credit crisis). To further categorize these crisis, I believe the one in 2018 that we're leaning towards to are more to bubbles and speculations based on the current looks of it. 

Well, it doesn't matter.
Now, towards the title of this post: How will your portfolio look like during the next financial crisis?
A bear market is described as 20% or more downturn, so what exactly is a crash?



During Black Monday 1987, DJIA had fallen close to 40%.
During Asian Financial Crisis 1997, STI had fallen by 65%.
During Global Financial Crisis 2008, DJIA had fallen by slightly over 50% while STI had fallen close to 60%. 

Base on some of the few crashes from the indexes listed above, a crash is basically a drop somewhere between 40 to 60%

Factoring that in, I've done a rough calculation based on my current equities holding.
I should be looking at a value somewhere between S$2,600 - S$3,900
At this very moment of writing, I'm already seeing a drop of ~5% since the peak on January.

While there is some ways like having a sufficient war chest/taking profit for some of your holdings or even diversifying it into gold for hedge that you'll be able to do now to fully make use of this crash. 

I guess I should now start to digest this value I'm seeing up there.
Holy!
 
How will your portfolio look like? :)

Read:



Friday, 26 January 2018

Everyone is different - Investors Mindset

Every investor have their own belief and thesis towards each investment.
Every investor have different risk appetite and guidelines to evaluate an investment.


Just before anything. Do you know why you're investing for? 
Make sure it's not because your friend told you so. Your friend might be providing you with one of the answer towards your question. But I'm sure that's not the only one.

Let's go into the topic now shall we?
Do you know why prices goes up or down for the assets? This is due to people buying and selling. Simple isn't it? In every transaction out here, each buying order that is filled will mean that someone is selling. Those that are buying would have just entered the position while those that are selling have just exited the position.

When you exit your position, does it signify that your thesis have been met or this particular asset is currently over-valued? If so, congratulations. There is also another possibility that the price now has triggered your stop loss or that the current situation deviates too much away from your thesis. Now, this will be another situation that differs from the first. Take this as a lesson learnt.

How about your thesis and game-play? Is this an asset play, growth story or income play? You'll have to know this well before you initiate any position! Different people are keen in different play due to their circumstances and what they want from this investment. A good key towards this is diversification. Having a basket of investment filled for both growth and income will be able to tie you through the situation.

Wait. Just a moment. Are you having an adequate amount of cash position too in your war-chest? This funds here will be useful when Mr Market is undergoing a depression! With an appropriate amount of cash you'll be able to make good use of the situation like big market crashes and benefit from it when the market and economy recovers!

Now what is an adequate amount of cash position? Well. I do not know. This is truly up to one self to determine. Some are comfortable with 15% while some need 50%. To each it's own. But definitely to hold more when the market is getting over-valued.

Never forget to NOT over-invest yourself. Do you have sufficient emergency funds with you?
Ahh. Now we're back to the same question aren't we? What is sufficient? The answer for this is heavily dependent on your expenses. 6 months? 12 months? I don't know. Up to you to determine. Assuming you were to go for 6 months, one with higher expenses will definitely need more amount to tie them through than someone who has a lesser expenses.

But again. This funds here (emergency funds) are a fund that you will need in any time soon. And this funds will ONLY be used when you're facing a difficult situation. Not for occasions like a vacation or what.

What about your risk appetite? Some are more conservative, while some are more courageous. You do remember that in each 'investment' there is risk right? Now, your risk that you're taking will be compensated by the returns from each investment. A higher risk investment will reap you a greater return than the one that is safer. I'm sure.

Again, to be safe and yet you want to win? Get a basket filled with both conservative asset and higher risk investment. Diversification is the key remember? Diversification. Not Diworsification. Balance your portfolio evenly and ensure that they compromise of both asset. A higher allocation towards 'safer assets' will be able to provide you with some cushion when your risky investment.

Read: 
Is investment really so difficult?
Buy and Hold - Who sold you that idea?
The traps in stock market
Transaction Cost - Are you a trader or an investor? 

Do you now know why you're investing for?
If so, what is your risk appetite and belief towards each investment? :)